Thursday, January 24, 2013

FAMOUS FIRST LINES REVEAL HOW TO START A NOVEL





January 18, 2013
 by Zachary Petit

On this day in 1873, writer and politician Edward Bulwer-Lytton died. One thing he left behind: The first line from his novel Paul Clifford: “It was a dark and stormy night …”

The sentence went on to serve as the literary posterchild for bad story starters, and it also became the inspiration behind the annual Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest, in which writers compete for top honors by penning egregiously bad fake first lines. (That said, Bulwer-Lytton’s work wasn’t all bad—after all, he gave us the quote “the pen is mightier than the sword” with his play Richelieu.)

Reflecting on awful first lines (and, admittedly, drinking out of this delightful Great First Lines of Literature Mug) got me thinking about the inverse. In no particular order, here are some of my favorite openings. Share yours in the Comments below.

The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents.
—Gabriel Garcia Marquez, One Hundred Years of Solitude

A screaming comes across the sky.
—Thomas Pynchon, Gravity’s Rainbow

It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen.
—George Orwell, 1984

It was a pleasure to burn.
—Ray Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451

The Man in Black fled across the desert, and the Gunslinger followed.
—Stephen King, The Gunslinger

Mother died today.
—Albert Camus, The Stranger

The flash projected the outline of the hanged man onto the wall.
—Arturo Perez-Reverte, The Club Dumas

This is a tale of a meeting of two lonesome, skinny, fairly old white men on a planet which was dying fast.
—Kurt Vonnegut, Breakfast of Champions

I write this sitting in the kitchen sink.
—Dodie Smith, I Capture the Castle

If you’re going to read this, don’t bother.
—Chuck Palahniuk, Choke

Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.
—Leo Tolstoy, Anna Karenina

True! – nervous – very, very nervous I had been and am; but why will you say that I am mad?
—Edgar Allan Poe, The Tell-Tale Heart

If you really want to hear about it, the first thing you’ll probably want to know is where I was born, and what my lousy childhood was like, and how my parents were occupied and all before they had me, and all that David Copperfield kind of crap, but I don’t feel like going into it, if you want to know the truth.
—J.D. Salinger, The Catcher in the Rye

I am a sick man … I am a spiteful man.
—Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Notes from Underground

We were somewhere around Barstow on the edge of the desert when the drugs began to take hold.
—Hunter S. Thompson, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas

It was love at first sight.
—Joseph Heller, Catch 22

Behind every man now alive stand thirty ghosts, for that is the ratio by which the dead outnumber the living.
—Arthur C. Clarke,  2001: A Space Odyssey

So, what goes into a great first line? We commissioned writer Jacob M. Appel to do a piece for the magazine on this very subject. Here are some tips from his article “Better Starts for Better Stories” (check out the full piece here):



7 WAYS TO START by Jacob M. Appel

1. A statement of eternal principle.
This technique is a staple of European classics. Think of Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice (“It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife.”) and Leo Tolstoy’s Anna Karenina (“Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.”). Of course, the story or novel you write must confirm the proposed principle. If it turned out that Mr. Darcy didn’t want to wed, or that Anna was happily married, these openings would certainly leave readers wanting. (An excellent contemporary example is from Jane Hamilton’s The Book of Ruth: “What it begins with, I know finally, is the kernel of meanness in people’s hearts. …”)

2. A statement of simple fact.
The entire weight of the narrative can sometimes be conveyed in a single statement. Think of, “I had a farm in Africa” (Isak Dinesen’s Out of Africa) or, “It was a pleasure to burn” (Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451) or, “I am an invisible man” (Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man). No gimmicks. No fireworks. Just—as Mr. Gradgrind demands in the opening line of Charles Dickens’ Hard Times—the facts.

3. A statement of paired facts.
In many cases, two facts combined are more powerful than either one on its own. The paradigmatic example is the opening line of Carson McCullers’ The Heart Is a Lonely Hunter: “In the town there were two mutes, and they were always together.” A town with two mutes is not necessarily compelling, nor are two inseparable men. But a town with two inseparable mutes? Now that locks in our interest.

4. A statement of simple fact laced with significance.
Because readers don’t read backward, it’s possible to bury a key piece of a story in an opening so that, by the time it becomes relevant, the reader has forgotten it. Agatha Christie mysteries do this often. The key to solving the crime in Murder on the Orient Express, for example, is embedded innocuously in the opening sentence. So is the key to the heroine’s psyche in Margaret Mitchell’s Gone With the Wind, the opening of which explains, “Scarlett O’Hara was not beautiful. …”

5. A statement to introduce voice.
“Lolita, light of my life, fire of my loins.” Vladimir Nabokov’s celebrated opening is not designed to convey characterization or plot, though both are present, so much as to introduce his distinctive style. Anthony Burgess opens A Clockwork Orange (“What’s it going to be then, eh?”) without any plot, characterization or setting at all—merely the ominous voice that will accompany the reader through the text. Stories that begin with a highly unusual voice often withhold other craft elements for a few sentences—a reasonable choice, as the reader may need to adjust to a new form of language before being able to absorb much in the way of content.

6. A statement to establish mood.
Contextual information not directly related to the story can often color our understanding of the coming narrative. Take Sylvia Plath’s opening to The Bell Jar: “It was a queer, sultry summer, the summer they electrocuted the Rosenbergs, and I didn’t know what I was doing in New York.” While the Rosenberg execution has nothing to do with the content of the narrative, it sets an ominous tone for what follows.

7. A statement that serves as a frame.
Sometimes, the best way to begin a story is to announce that you’re about to tell a story. English storytellers have been doing this since at least the first recorded use of the phrase “Once upon a time” in the 14th century. Mark Twain’s The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn starts off this way, as does J.D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye. After all, a brilliant opening can be as straightforward as: “You are about to begin reading Italo Calvino’s new novel, If on a Winter’s Night a Traveler …” (which really does start exactly that way).

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Free Download: 2013 Oscar Nominated Screenplays

It's that time of year again. OSCAR TIME!
The following list of nominated screenplays was sent to me along with write up. Read and feel free to download the screenplays.



Beasts of the Southern Wild

Written by Lucy Alibar & Benh Zeitlin (Zeitlin is also nominated for Best Director)
Synopsis:  In an isolated Louisiana swampland known as the Bathtub, young Hushpuppy and her father are part of a community that lives outside of the structure of modern society.  When rising flood waters threaten the area, the young girl’s resourcefulness and lively imagination are called into play as the region’s residents face the approaching disaster.
Adapted from:
Lucy Alibar’s play, Juicy and Delicious
Fun Facts:
  • Zeitlin and Alibar originally met at summer camp as teenagers.
  • This is Behn Zeitlin’s first feature length film (and he landed an Oscar nom. Not a bad start).
My Thoughts:
Quite simply, it’s a beautiful story, beautifully told. That’s really all there is to say about Beasts.

Life of Pi

Written by David Magee (previously nominated for Finding Neverland (2004))
Synopsis: Young Pi, the son of zookeepers in Pondicherry, India, finds the world he knows swept away when his family sells the zoo and sets sail for Canada with a few of its remaining animals.  A storm capsizes the ship and only Pi escapes, set adrift in a lifeboat that is also the refuge of an enormous Bengal tiger.
Adapted From:
Yann Martel’s  2001 novel Life of Pi
Fun Facts:
Magee also wrote the script for Miss Pettigrew Lives For A Day (2008)
My thoughts:
While most of the attention has been going to the film’s Director, Ang Lee, it’s Magee’s work that molded what many considered to be an unfilmable book into a Best Picture Nominee.

Lincoln

Written by Tony Kushner (previously nominated for Munich (2005)
Synopsis: With the Civil War coming to a close and the freedom granted to the slaves by the Emancipation Proclamation called into question, Abraham Lincoln seeks to pass a thirteenth amendment to the Constitution that will outlaw slavery everywhere in the United States.  Facing opposition from many quarters in Congress, Lincoln uses his vast political powers to gain allies in his fight.
Adapted From:
Doris Kearns Goodwin’s non-fiction  account of the time, Team of Rivals
Fun Facts:
Kushner won the Pulitzer Prize for his play, Angels in America
My thoughts:
Kushner does a great job of showing the toll that great actions can take on great men, and the script reads as slightly less schmaltzy than it became after Spielberg got his hands on it.

Silver Linings Playbook

Written by David O. Russell (Russell is also nominated for Best Director)
Synopsis: Pat Solatano is released into his parents’ care after eight months of treatment for a bipolar disorder.  His recovery seems far from certain, however, when he stops taking his medication and becomes increasingly obsessed with winning back his estranged wife, a plan that leads him to embark on a complicated relationship with a troubled young woman whose husband has died.
Adapted From:
Matthew Quick’s 2012 novel Silver Linings Playbook
Fun Facts:
  • Previously received a Best Director nomination for The Fighter (2010)
  • Also wrote and directed Three Kings (1994) and Flirting With Disaster (1999)
My thoughts:
It’s a beautifully quirky script that sings off the page. Russell (and some of the credit has to go to Quick) have proved that the Romantic Comedy genre isn’t dead, it’s just waiting for someone to care enough to do something original with it.

And the winner is…

For my money, Silver Linings Playbook should take home for the Oscar for not only being a slick and smart script, but for revitalizing an entire genre. David O. Russell has had a distinctly hit or miss career, but Silver Linings has him back at the top of his game. I think the Academy get this one right – Russell will, and should, win the night.

Best Screenplay, Original

Amour

Written by Michael Haneke (Haneke is also nominated for Best Director)
Synopsis: In the final months of her life, a retired music teacher and her husband of sixty years struggle with the debilitating effects of two strokes on both her health and her quality of life.  As Georges cares for the increasingly unhappy Anne, the pair finds the nature of their life together irrevocably changed.
Fun Facts:
  • Haneke has 23 writing credits stretching all the way back to 1974
  • He wrote and directed the original Funny Games (1997), which was remade by Hollywood in 2007 with Naomi Watts and Tim Roth
My thoughts:
The script for Amour is a character piece of true pain and beauty. It’s a shining example to all writers of what you can do while still writing to your budget.

Django Unchained

Written by Quentin Tarantino
Synopsis: German bounty hunter Dr. King Schultz buys a slave named Django and promises him his freedom once he has helped Schultz track down the criminals he is seeking.  But Django has a wife who was sold off years ago, and his partnership with Schultz may offer him a chance to find her.
Fun Facts:
This is Quentin Tarantino’s fifth Academy Award nomination, having previously been nominated in Best Original Screenplay and Best Director categories for Inglorious Basterds (2009) and Pulp Fiction (1994), for which he won the Academy Award for Best Original Screenplay.
My thoughts:
Django is one of those scripts that the more I think about it, the less I like it. It’s overly long (landing right around 200 pages), doesn’t feature any real character arc for its Protagonist, and doesn’t feature any real subplots to the main narrative (not a necessity, but it would be a plus). All in all, it’s my least favorite work of Tarantino’s to date (excluding Grindhouse and Four Rooms).

Flight

Written by John Gatins (first-time Academy Award nominee)
Synopsis: When commercial airline pilot Whip Whitaker reports for his next flight after a night of drinking, his crew suspects that he may not be fit to fly the plane.  Following a crash during which he executes a daring series of maneuvers that saves the lives of nearly everyone on board, Whitaker is proclaimed a hero…until a blood test taken at the crash scene reveals both alcohol and drugs in his system.
Fun Facts:
Gatins has been in the game a while, having previously written Hard Ball (2001), Coach Carter (2005), and Real Steel (2011)
My thoughts:
I didn’t personally care for Flight outside of the amazingly terrifying crash sequence at the beginning. The script reads more like a Hallmark Movie that a major motion picture and, especially towards the end, gets more than a little preachy. Without Denzel’s stellar performance (as usual) I don’t think Flight would have taken off the way it has.

Moonrise Kingdom

Written by Wes Anderson & Roman Coppola (Coppola is a first-time Academy Award nominee)
Synopsis: Suzy lives with her family in an island lighthouse off the east coast, where she has won the heart of twelve-year-old Sam, an orphaned Scout spending his summer at camp.  Over the year since their first meeting, the two have grown closer through their letters to each other and are planning to run off together for a week in the wilderness when Sam returns to camp.
Fun Facts:
  • Wes Anderson received a previous nomination in the Best Screenplay category for The Royal Tenenbaums (2001), and directed The Fantastic Mr. Fox (2009) which was nominated as Best Animated Film.
  • Roman Coppola also co-wrote Anderson’s last film, The Darjeeling Limited (2007)
  • Anderson co-wrote his first feature film, Bottle Rocket (1996) with his college friend, Owen Wilson. The film was originally a short which garnered a lot of attention at Sundance, eventually landing in front of James L. Brooks, who decided to ask Anderson to create a feature length version.
My thoughts:
The script for Moonrise Kingdom has all of the trademark Wes Anderson aspects you’ve come to expect (for good or bad depending on your opinion of the auteur), but it recaptured some of the heart that has been missing from a lot of his work since Rushmore (1998).

Zero Dark Thirty

Written by Mark Boal
Synopsis: In the aftermath of 9/11, as the trail in the hunt for Osama bin Laden seems to grow cold, a determined CIA agent begins a painstaking, decade-long search for the Al Qaeda leader.  For Maya, direct experience of terrorism steels her resolve to find bin Laden and leads her to trust her own instincts regarding the best course of investigation to pursue.
Fun Facts:
  • Boal was a freelance journalist when he wrote a 2004 article called “Death and Dishonor” which was published by Playboy magazine. Writer/director Paul Haggis read the article, and used it as inspiration for his film, In The Valley of Elah (2007). And that was his break into Hollywood.
  • Boal is a previous Oscar winner, having taken home statues as a writer and producer for The Hurt Locker(2009)
My thoughts:
Zero Dark Thirty is another gritty war drama that captures the dedication (and obsession) that it took to capture Osama bin Laden. While I didn’t find the script as captivating as The Hurt Locker due to a lack of character development (unlike Django, I felt this was justified from a story aspect, but it kept me at arms-length from the Protagonist), it’s still an extremely well written script that’s taut with drama.

And the winner is…

This is a tough one. The smart money is on Mark Boal to take home his second Academy Award for Zero Dark Thirty. A lot of voters simply won’t be able to resist the story of how we brought down the mastermind behind 9-11, and I won’t be terribly disappointed when it does win. But if it was my choice (and it’s not), I’d let Wes Anderson and Roman Coppola take the little golden man home. Moonrise Kingdom is the lovely, quirky, heartfelt story we’ve been waiting for from Anderson for some time, and his unique voice is one that deserves to be rewarded.

5 Agents Seeking New Clients

Hello everyone. 

I've been busy lately. This is the time of year writers are preparing their scripts to send to contests. So I've been getting a lot of those.

Following is some info about new agents. I got it in an email this morning.

*******

When trying to get your manuscript published, it's often beneficial to have an agent on your side. Agents not only have connections within the publishing industry but they also read hundreds of proposals a year, giving them better perspective of what will sell and what won't. They often offer suggestions and advice on how to get your manuscript into publishable shape (whether that's change a character, introduce an additional storyline, or start the story in a different spot, etc.).

One of the best resources for finding an agent is the Guide to Literary Agents, which is the bible for finding representation-heck, it helped me find and land my agent. It features spot-on advice on how to approach querying and has more than 500 agent listings, including what types of books they are looking for, how each one wants you to pitch them and more.

GLA editor Chuck Sambuchino gives you a sneak peek on his GLA blog, posting his popular new agent alerts, highlighting up-and-coming agents and agents that have recently moved to new agencies. More important, all of them are looking for new clients. Here are five agents whom he's featured and who are looking to sign new writers:

1. Brittany Howard of Corvisiero Literary Agency

She is seeking: Her first love is YA- from High Fantasy to Paranormal to to soft Sci-Fi to Contemporary- she loves all young adult. She also likes high concept, adventure themed, and funny MG, but a strong voice is MUST for her in MG. She's willing to look at Picture Books, but is very selective.
Find out more about Brittany and how to submit to her here.

2. Margaret Bail of Andrea Hurst & Associates

She is seeking: adult fiction only. Specifically, she seeks romance, science fiction, thrillers, action/adventure, historical fiction, Western, fantasy (think Song of Fire and Ice or Dark Tower, NOT Lord of the Rings or Chronicles of Narnia).
Find out more about Margaret and how to submit to her here.

3. Samantha Dighton of D4EO Literary

She is seeking: Sam is looking for character-driven stories with strong voice. She likes characters who are relatable yet flawed, vibrant settings that take on a life of their own, and a story that lasts well beyond the final page, generally falling within these categories: Literary fiction, Historical fiction, Mystery/suspense, Magical realism, Psychological thrillers, Young adult (realistic) and Narrative nonfiction.
Find out more about Samantha and how to submit to her here.

4. Andy Scheer of Hartline Literary Agency

He is seeking: "I'm looking for a select few, outstanding projects that grab me and won't let me go until I place them with a publisher. For fiction, this means a memorable blend of characters, setting, and storyline-delivered with carefully crafted prose. For nonfiction, a unique way of addressing a real need with an authority readers will recognize. And for both, the individual's desire to grow in the craft of writing and to undertake the required discipline to promote their work for others' benefit."
Find out more about Andy and how to submit to him here.

5. Jennifer Udden of the Donald Maass Literary Agency

She is seeking: science fiction, fantasy, and mysteries - and is particularly interested in finding works that creatively combine aspects of all three genres.
Find out more about Jennifer and how to submit to her here.

For more news and information about agents, I highly recommend checking out the Guide to Literary Agents Blog and getting a copy of the 2013 Guide to Literary Agents. Both are extremely valuable resources and, without them, I may never have been able to land my agent (or secure a book deal).

Friday, January 18, 2013

X-Ray Specs: Act II – Arguing for a Narrative Question with a Positive Purpose


(This article was emailed to me today. It is written by a script writer, Robert Piluso, giving his perspective on writing Act II. There are other articles on my blog about writing Act II. however, it is good to to get views from different writers)
It doesn’t matter if you’ve written one script, half a script, or one hundred scripts: writing Act II is tough. It’s a slog. It’s a job. It’s a challenge, to prevent that notorious “Act II sag”—to generate enough obstacles, reversals, sub-plots, character development, sharp dialogue, and the like, to carry the story through from beginning to end.
Perhaps because the process of writing Act I, those first enthused 30-or-so pages, has all the thrill and charms of falling in love. That’s because you are: you’re falling in love with the story you want to tell, with the characters you’re creating…. But then…? You’re in love. You’re committed. You will tell this story. Now what?
There’s a secret to successfully framing Act II. It’s called the Narrative Question. Most usually (we’re talking traditional film here—not mumblecore, not avant garde), Act II presents a predicament that will be answered with “yes” or “no” by the end of Act II. Professor David Howard at the University of Southern California’s School of Cinematic Arts calls this the “Main Tension” in his book, The Tools of Screenwriting, co-written with Edward Mabley.
Marlon Brando in The Godfather PHOTO: PARAMOUNT HOME ENTERTAINMENT
This Narrative Question you might even recognize as the main substance of your logline (if you have one, yet). If drafting a logline poses difficulty for you (don’t dishearten—it does for so many us), the problem isn’t in distilling the entire story (Acts I, II, III) into one sentence—it’s in knowing your Narrative Question of Act II.
The Narrative Question, or, put another way, the Protagonist’s Main Objective,mustbepositive. By positive, we don’t mean the protagonist must want to save the orphanage kiddies from leprous goblins; we mean the Goal must be “pro-social”. It must be something the audience would like to see happen. The audience, after all, is giving you its time to hear your story. Why would people want to give you their time if you’re working to give them something they don’t want?
Imagine the Narrative Question for a spec about a first-date: “Will the Loathsome Lothario successfully manipulate and seduce the naive young girl by the end of the night?” Gross! We don’t want that to happen. “Will the Loathsome Lothario discover True Love and be redeemed by the virtuous, irresistible young woman?” That we might be interested to see. It’s all in how you frame Act II.
The frame, or Narrative Question, will emerge from the spirit of the piece, which emerges from the spirit of the protagonist. And if you’ve got an antihero on your hands, you’ve got your work cut out for you: as the writer, you’ve almost got to convince the audience you’re not a sociopath yourself. Rather, you’re telling your story with the necessary critical distance from the antihero protagonist and his or her machinations (sometimes recognized by audiences as irony, which is just another word for “drama”—the difference between what the audience knows/expects and the characters think they know/can expect). Your audience has to feel you’re one of them, one of their society—that you value what they value. Which validates them. And their beliefs. At least in the West, people have always paid good money to watch their beliefs validated and reflected back at themselves in an entertaining way. (Euripedes bloody well knew this, didn’t he?)
Not convinced yet as to the necessity of a positive, pro-social, protagonist objective? Don’t take my word for it—take it from one of the Masters:
ALFRED HITCHCOCK:  “In an adventure drama your central figure must have a purpose. That’s vital for progression of the film, and it’s also a key factor in audience participation. The public must be rooting for the character; they should almost be helping him to achieve his goal. John Gielgud, the hero of The Secret Agent, has an assignment [to kill a man], but the job is distasteful and he is reluctant to do it. Therefore, because it’s a negative purpose, the film is static—it doesn’t move forward.” (Interview by Francois Truffaut, Hitchcock, page 105)
Now for some examples. Let’s consider Quentin Tarantino’s Academy Award® nominee for Best Original Screenplay, Django Unchained. It’s no spoiler to say the Narrative Question of Act II is, “Will Django rescue his wife from slavery?” This is a pro-social goal, a positive purpose, that everyone in the enlightened 21st Century audience can root for. We as a society value love, marriage, and freeing goodness from evil’s clutches; also, we’re all anti-slavery. There are numerous obstacles and complications Django must overcome, but it’s clear as crystal. It’s simple. It works.
What doesn’t work: Diablo Cody’s Young Adult. Here, Mavis (Charlize Theron) returns to her hometown to break up her high school sweetheart’s marriage—knowing full-well he’s a new father. In the story, Mavis has no one on her side who wants to help her accomplish this “negative purpose”—in the audience, Mavis doesn’t have many supporters, either. Who wants to root for someone to destroy a good man’s good life? That’s not pro-social. The film is, as Hitchcock warns, “static” just as Mavis cannot “move forward”—as emotionally, so narratively.
For an example of an anti-hero in a pro-social context, let’s turn to The Godfather (screenplay by Mario Puzo and Francis Ford Coppola). Yes, our main characters are gangsters…but, within their world, their time, they are the “good” gangsters. Don Vito Corleone is anti-drug; in fact, his anti-drug policy instigates Act 2 when the “bad” gangster, The Turk, attempts assassinating the Don. Narrative Question: “Will the Corleone Family be able to maintain its power and weather the Gang War?” A sub-goal for protagonist Michael is, “Can Michael avenge his father’s near-fatal attack by killing The Turk?” At first, it seems we’re being asked to root for Michael to commit murder. But even murder, when reframed as a matter of a family loyalty and righteous vengeance, an audience can get behind. Throw in some hesitation, some healthy reluctance—all the better. This is the Hamlet Trick.
If you look for it, you’ll find the Hamlet Trick again and again in films with an anti-hero seeking to accomplish a “negative objective”: the protagonist is out to kill someone who hurt/killed the protagonist’s beloved family member, lover, or friend. Family is pro-social, loyalty is pro-social, justice is pro-social, and love is pro-social, and so these values transcend the anti-social nature of the protagonist’s negative objective. And make the audience comfortable enough to root for the anti-hero.
Can you identify the Narrative Question of your script’s Act II? Can it be answered with “yes” or “no” by the time you get to Act III? Regarding stories with “yes” answers, the price for the protagonist’s victory usually hits hard and heavy in Act III (“oh, NO!”).
With “no” answers to Act II Narrative Questions, you’ll start Act III in False Resolution territory for a while—that is, until the protagonist must pull one last strategy or endure one last twist of fate and triumph by story’s end (“oh, YEAH!”).
For this reason, Happy Endings tend to coincide with “No” answers to Act II Narrative Questions, while Down Endings tend to coincide with “Yes” answers.
Act II Narrative Question: Could Elliot keep ET safe from The Government? No.
Act III: Did reanimated ET finally find his way home, anyway? Yes.
Act II Narrative Question: Did Tony Scarface Montana achieve the American Dream and become a big-time drug kingpin? Yes.
Act III: Did Tony live long enough to enjoy his success? No.
Act III Narrative Question: Could The Avengers stop bickering long enough to prevent full-scale alien invasion of Earth? No.
Act III: Did The Avengers still totally win and save everyone? Yes.
Good luck, good writing, and keep looking deeper into story—your own and others’—until when next we polish our X-RAY SPECS.

If you would like a detail critique or edit of your script, feel free to use my services.


Dantalian no Shoka
Knowledge is power.

I have been getting a lot of request for loglines. I give different prices . Since I have so many requests for this service, I decided to set a single fix price.

Logline: $5.00 Flat Fee

A synopsis or summery is required. It well be used to form the logline. The logline is just one line.



Screenplays

Critique: $50.00 Flat Fee, 

 Includes evaluating the basis elements of a script

  •  Introduction
  •  Development
  •  Climax
  •  Conclusion
  • Character development 
  •  Mid point development

Critiques also provide suggestions for improvements and enhancement. 



Payments are made by Paypal or cashier check by mail.


Other services are at regular price.



Query Letters: $25.00 Flat Fee  



Editing: $46.00 Flat Fee
  •  Evaluating formatting to industry standards
  •  Spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence structure, etc.

Turnaround time:

Editing: 2 weeks

Critique: 2 weeks
Query Letters: 2 weeks


Feel free to contact me at ahicks4298@q.com or  ahicks4298@msn.com.
Feel to call me at (360) 696-4298. Ask for Frances.

I also critique and edit books. I am currently organizing the service prices for working on books. If you are interested in me critiquing or editing a novel you have written, feel free contact me.
*
*
Film script format, writing film scripts, screenwriting services, coverage service, screenplay formatting margins, screenplay writing, screenplay format example, Search terms: screenplays, screenwriting service, edit and critique service, writing screenplays, screenplay format, loglines, query letter, film scripts, movie scripts, screenplay format, screenplay synopsis, script synopsis, treatment, proofreading service for writers, novels, writing services, fiction writing, film script format, writing film scripts, screenwriting service, coverage service, screenplay critique service, screenplay format margins, screenplay writing, screenplay format example, free writing tutorials,   script consultant, screenwriting jobs, film production companies

Monday, January 14, 2013

5 WAYS TO COME UP WITH GREAT STORY IDEAS

 
By Brian A Klems

We all have a million excellent ideas for stories, but, without fail, they magically disappear the minute we sit down to write. It seems impossible, but it happens constantly. Hours are wasted staring at a blank page. And, no matter how many cups of coffee are in our systems, we still can’t find the energy to kick our muses into gear and develop story ideas.
Have no fear: I have five ways that will help pump up your creativity muscle and build story ideas that will keep you writing for hours on end. Here they are.

1. Reinvent a scene from a book.

Take a very small, seemingly non-important scene from one of your favorite books and consider what it’d be like if that were the opening scene to your novel. Change the characters of course, and add one or more unique elements to that scene. The key is to give you a starting point and then let your imagination run wild. While there are many ways to stay inspired, this challenge really takes something that you love (an old book) and gives it new life.

2. Use junk mail as inspiration.

Take the next two pieces of spam mail you receive (either snail mail or e-mail) and use it to determine the profession on your protagonist and your protagonist’s love interest. I get this type of mail all of the time, particularly from politicians, credit card companies and auto dealerships—and that’s just what’s delivered by the United States Postal Service! When I add in the junk sent to my e-mail inbox, I get “foreign ambassadors from Nigeria” looking for million dollar loans and women begging me to click through to get “erotic” pictures of them. Any one of these jobs will lead to many fun and unusual situations—and will give you plenty of fodder to write about.

3. Invent a history for someone with whom you’ve lost touch.

We have all had friends in our lives from grade school, high school or college that we knew quite well back then, but haven’t seen much (if at all) since. In fact, most of their lives are a mystery to us. Pick one of those old friends and write about the life they’ve been leading ever since you lost touch. What happened in his or her family life? What career path did he or she choose? Was he or she involved in something that led them to a life of crime? The possibilities are endless, which should drive you to be as creative as possible.

4. Eavesdrop on a conversation.

Just because you’re stuck in a bit of a funk when it comes to ideas doesn’t mean that other people are. Take your notepad or laptop out of the house, sit down somewhere and observe the scenery around you—and listen to any and every conversation within earshot. You can do this at a park, restaurant, coffee shop or, my personal favorite, a bar (people who have a few drinks in them tend to share the best stories). Remember, jot down all the stories you hear but be sure to give them a twist to make them your own.

5. Find a writing prompt and run with it.

Sometimes the best cure for writer’s block is to let someone else start your story for you. You can search the web and find a number of sites that offer them, or check out our database of creative writing prompts that gets updated every Tuesday. And who knows: The idea you get from a writing prompt may be just the inspiration you need to spark your creativity and write a short story or novel that sells.